More information and the download is available here.
Tuesday, March 27. 2012
Video - vCDAudit for vCloud Director
New Book - VMware vSphere 5 Performance: Solving CPU, Memory, Storage, and Networking Issues

Divulges troubleshooting methodologies, performance monitoring tools, and techniques and tools for isolating performance problems Details the necessary steps for handling CPU, memory, storage, and network-related problems Offers understanding on the interactions between VMware vSphere and CPU, memory, storage, and network VMware vSphere 5 Performance is the resource you need to diagnose and handle VMware vSphere performance problems.
Posted by Eric Sloof
at
12:11
Friday, March 23. 2012
Xsigo Server Fabric Performance Test Results
The folks at Xsigo have done some performance benchmarking -- on their own server fabric but still, in this emerging space, numbers are still hard to come by and these illustrate some of what’s possible as the industry moves in this direction.
This is a really short write-up they did with info on the test bed, the tests performed and some graphs and screenshots, but the summary results show that compared to 1G and 10G Ethernet, the Xsigo ServerFabric delivered:
- 2.4X the Ethernet traffic of a 10G Ethernet connection (throughput to a single virtual machine)
- 20Gbps throughput measured to a single NIC on a single virtual machine
- 15X faster vMotion than1G Ethernet
- 67% faster vMotion than 10G Ethernet
In performance benchmark testing, the Xsigo Server Fabric demonstrated significantly higher network device throughput as compared to 1G Ethernet and 10G Ethernet server connections.
XsigoServerFabricPerformanceTestResults.pdf
Posted by Eric Sloof
at
13:43
Wednesday, March 21. 2012
Technical Paper - Stretched Clusters and VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager
This paper is intended to clarify concepts involved with choosing solutions for vSphere site availability, and to help understand the use cases for availability solutions for the virtualized infrastructure. Specific guidance is given around the intended use of DR solutions like VMware vCenter Site Recovery Manager and contrasted with the intended use of geographically stretched clusters spanning multiple datacenters. While both solutions excel at their primary use case, their strengths lie in different areas which are explored within.
The purpose of this paper is to clarify some of the concepts involved with vSphere site availability, and to help understand the use cases for these availability solutions in the vSphere landscape. The intent is to provide guidance not in terms of purchasing decisions or products, but in terms of what various technologies intend to do and how to best achieve availability goals for your environment.
When designing for availability, in many instances the solution architect will have to choose between these technologies. Stretched clusters are incompatible with Site Recovery Manager and therefore, the architect is faced with a decision whether to choose active non-disruptive site balancing with unmanaged crash recovery via a stretched cluster or choose a robust disaster recovery solution that will restart failed services in a controlled and known fashion but is predicated on service outage.
Posted by Eric Sloof
at
10:03